Interesting article re: real estate bubble. The net of it is that typically RE slows occur as prices stagnate (rather than decline) for long periods of time. "Busts within a five-year window of booms only occurred in 9 of the 54 boom episodes identified prior to 1998, or roughly 17 percent of all such events. "
Clearly, the lion's share of home-price booms have not ended in busts historically," the report states. That leaves 45 booms that did not see a subsequent bust, according to the report"
That being said, the prospects of flat growth, risk of bubble may make one wonder whether it’s time to take some capital gains off the table.
==========================================
Will this housing boom go bust? FDIC investigates causes of house-price booms
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
By Jessica Swesey, Inman News
The rapid rise in U.S.
The growth in home prices over the past year surpasses any increase in the last 25 years, according to data released by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, which tracks average quarterly house-price changes. Some economists have raised an eye to this unprecedented run-up in prices, saying it may be cause for concern.
Sixty-three U.S.
California
The FDIC defines a "bust" as an inflation-adjusted price decline of 15 percent or more in five years. Using these criteria, some 21 cities were found to have experienced a housing bust at some point over the last 25 years.
The report identifies two "major episodes" of home-price busts, the first taking place in the mid-1980s in the "oil patch" cities of Texas Oklahoma Louisiana
The second incident of major price declines occurred in the Northeast and California
The report notes that no cities are currently experiencing home-price busts. However, judging by historical events, we won't know for a few years whether the recent post-boom cities have safely avoided a bust.
And according to the report's criteria for booms and busts, home-price booms "only infrequently" lead to busts.
Busts within a five-year window of booms only occurred in 9 of the 54 boom episodes identified prior to 1998, or roughly 17 percent of all such events. "Clearly, the lion's share of home-price booms have not ended in busts historically," the report states.
That leaves 45 booms that did not see a subsequent bust, according to the report.
In 83 percent of the post-boom cities, prices continued to increase at a slower rate and any declines after inflation were modest, according to the report. "Home prices in these markets simply stagnated, or stalled out, following their booms rather than going bust."
Housing booms that have ended in price busts were associated with localized economic stress, including recession and job loss.
The FDIC noted two case studies to illustrate this point, including the case of the oil patch cities in the mid-'80s, and the busts seen in California
Texas Oklahoma Louisiana Colorado Wyoming Alaska
"This economic stress, in turn, weighed heavily on the housing markets in these cities. In the worst cases, nominal home prices fell by 40 percent and 33 percent in Lafayette, Louisiana, and Casper, Wyoming, respectively, between 1983 and 1988," the report states.
In the case of California
Although the FDIC demonstrates that few metro-area housing booms have ended in busts historically, the report notes reasons to believe history may be an imperfect guide to today's situation. It notes changes in credit markets, such as the emergence of the subprime market, that are pushing homeowners and housing markets into uncharted territory.
"An increased incidence of default and foreclosure could, in turn, contribute to downward pressure on home prices as distressed properties are liquidated by lenders. However, little is known as yet about the effects these credit-market changes might have on the dynamics of boom-bust cycles," the report states.

Comments